Suchen in GiNDok

Recherchieren Sie hier in allen Dokumenten, die auf GiNDok publiziert wurden.

Ergebnisse für *

Es wurden 12 Ergebnisse gefunden.

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 5 von 12.

Sortieren

  1. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Philologie : Tagungsband ; 1. – 3. Juli 2010, Freie Universität Berlin, Internationale Arbeitstagung / Jens Elze, Zuzanna Jakubowski, Lore Knapp, Stefanie Orphal, Heidrun Schnitzler (Hg.)

    Export in Literaturverwaltung
    Hinweise zum Inhalt: kostenfrei
    Quelle: GiNDok
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Konferenzveröffentlichung; conferenceObject
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Philologie; Literaturtheorie
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/deed.de

    ;

    info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

  2. Philologie und interdisziplinäre Rahmenkonzepte : eine Fallstudie
    Erschienen: 13.10.2011

    This paper examines the well-known practice of developing a conceptual frame-work for reading works of literature in such a way as to illuminate previously ignored aspects of those works. It investigates the nature or genre of such discoveries: Are... mehr

     

    This paper examines the well-known practice of developing a conceptual frame-work for reading works of literature in such a way as to illuminate previously ignored aspects of those works. It investigates the nature or genre of such discoveries: Are they philological? Hermeneutic? Do they correspond to the discipline of the framework selected? This problem is considered in the case of an example of the deployment of a very specific philosophical framework, namely the problem of skepticism as glossed by the American philosopher Stanley Cavell. This framework brings to light a structural affinity between two seemingly disparate moments in the history of German lyric poetry: the Biedermeier period and the works of Konkrete Dichtung from the mid-twentieth century. The paper postulates this affinity as an exam-ple of the kind of “discovery” whose type, usefulness, or even existence as discovery might be called into question and perhaps not, ultimately, agreed on.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung
    Hinweise zum Inhalt: kostenfrei
    Quelle: GiNDok
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Konferenzveröffentlichung; conferenceObject
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Literaturwissenschaft; Skeptizismus; Cavell, Stanley; Biedermeier; Konkrete Poesie
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/deed.de

    ;

    info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

  3. Rephilologisierung und Entgrenzung : zwei Perspektiven für die Reiseliteraturforschung
    Erschienen: 13.10.2011

    Based on the metaphor of “liminality” in literary studies, this paper examines two different approaches to the literary genre of travelogues, using the example of Adelbert von Chamisso‟s Voyage Around the World (1836). One approach, with the help of... mehr

     

    Based on the metaphor of “liminality” in literary studies, this paper examines two different approaches to the literary genre of travelogues, using the example of Adelbert von Chamisso‟s Voyage Around the World (1836). One approach, with the help of autobiographical research, sheds light on the author-specific key motifs of “omnipotent time” and the process of aging. In the second approach, the focus shifts to the relationship between literature and natural science, i.e. to Chamisso‟s transitional position in the context of the historicization and dynamization of the sciences and humanities in the 19th century. Rather than thinking of “philology” and “cultural studies” as opposing methods, this article thus suggests a more in-tercessory position for the purpose of a fruitful study of travel literature.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung
    Hinweise zum Inhalt: kostenfrei
    Quelle: GiNDok
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Konferenzveröffentlichung; conferenceObject
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Reiseliteratur; Chamisso, Adelbert von / Reise um die Welt in den Jahren 1815-1818; Interdisziplinarität; Grenzsituation <Motiv>
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/deed.de

    ;

    info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

  4. Zu den Schwierigkeiten einer Wissenschaft vom literarischen Text
    Erschienen: 13.10.2011

    Is there something like a 'scientific' approach to the reading or interpretation of literary texts as is suggested by the German term 'Literaturwissenschaft'? This essay argues that genuinely scientific criteria such as the intersubjective... mehr

     

    Is there something like a 'scientific' approach to the reading or interpretation of literary texts as is suggested by the German term 'Literaturwissenschaft'? This essay argues that genuinely scientific criteria such as the intersubjective verifiability of a given reading do not apply to the reading of literary texts. The reason is that such texts enable a quasi infinite range of different readings the preconceptions of which are contingent upon the individual readers, their previous experiences, literary as well as non-literary, and their expectations. — What, then, are the tasks of a scholarly reading of literary texts? Firstly, the theoretical reflection upon the status of such texts in comparison to pragmatic texts; secondly, the attempt at reconstructing their historical context (in terms of discursive history), and thirdly, a reading with regard to present-day problems. The 'quality' of a scholarly reading of a literary text would thus be dependent not on its 'objectivity', but rather on its capacity to produce resonances amongst other present-day readers, scholarly and non-scholarly.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung
    Hinweise zum Inhalt: kostenfrei
    Quelle: GiNDok
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Konferenzveröffentlichung; conferenceObject
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Literaturwissenschaft; Methodologie
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/deed.de

    ;

    info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

  5. Innovation oder Wiederkehr? : Das Methodenspektrum im Kurzzeitgedächtnis der Literaturwissenschaft
    Erschienen: 13.10.2011

    In recent years, a pronounced methodological self-reflexiveness has been established as a standard in studying language and literature. Methodological pluralism and a specific methodological adaptation to the objects of study are a characteristic... mehr

     

    In recent years, a pronounced methodological self-reflexiveness has been established as a standard in studying language and literature. Methodological pluralism and a specific methodological adaptation to the objects of study are a characteristic feature of present-day literary and cultural studies. In keeping with this tendency, introductory textbooks on literary studies often provide an overview of the broad discussion and spectrum of methods and their seemingly boundless possible applications and the options for combining them. But this is not the first time that the boundaries of our discipline have undergone dissolution. Beginning with early examples of accounts of methodological variety and methodological reflection (Oscar Benda, Harry Maync, Emil Ermatinger, Julius Petersen), the present article discusses the ways in which an awareness of a surprisingly long tradition of discussions concerning methodological competence affects the present self-conception and identity of philology.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung
    Hinweise zum Inhalt: kostenfrei
    Quelle: GiNDok
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Konferenzveröffentlichung; conferenceObject
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Literatur und Rhetorik (800)
    Schlagworte: Methodologie; Maync, Harry; Ermatinger, Emil; Petersen, Julius (Philologe)
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/deed.de

    ;

    info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess